Peer review ensures quality in academic research by having experts evaluate and validate study results before publication, crucial for maintaining scholarly integrity.

Peer review is integral to a scholar’s journey, whether you’re trying to secure funding, present research at a conference, or publish your findings in a book or journal. Yet despite its ubiquity and ...

A survey of 1,600 academics found that more than 50% have used artificial intelligence tools while peer reviewing manuscripts ...

Half of Science Reviewers Use Artificial Intelligence. Three-Quarters Of Researchers Don’t Know When Publishers Do In A ...

Some requests by reviewers to cite their own publications are coercive and can unnecessarily delay indexation and publication.

Peer reviews cost firms time and effort, and some accountants believe the process is focused on finding mistakes, but the purpose of peer reviews is to enhance engagement quality. Peer reviews can ...

We are having difficulty finding a second reviewer for your manuscript.” This is a response we have received more than once ...

A new whitepaper from Frontiers shows that AI has rapidly become part of everyday peer review, with 53% of reviewers now ...

(Boston)—It is expected that in 2025, approximately three million articles will be indexed in Scopus and the Web of Science. If each undergoes peer review by two experts, and an additional 2 million ...

The perennial pressure to publish or perish is intense as ever for faculty trying to advance their careers in an exceedingly tight academic job market. On top of their teaching loads, faculty are ...

As part of its overall strategy to strengthen audit quality, in 2014 the AICPA issued the discussion paper Enhancing Audit Quality: Plans and Perspectives for the U.S. CPA Profession, which provides a ...

Agency staff members say that the changes are reasonable, but they are worried about the potential effects on review.